Consider a pn junction GaAs LED. Assume that photons are generated uniformly in all directions in a plane perpendicular to the junction.
Part A: Taking into account total internal reflection calculate the fraction of photons that have the potential of being emitted from the semiconductor.
Part B: Using the results of part (a) and including Fresnel loss, determine the fraction of generated photons that will be emitted from the semiconductor into air (neglect absorption losses).
For the following problem we can base on Snell's law for the critical angle, before we have total internal reflection, which is:
(4) |
Thus as we have been given the refractive indexes or GaAs - 3 and for air - 1 we have:
(5) |
Having the critical angle we can thus relate it to the total circle of 360 , which will give us the fraction of photons having the potential of being emitted:
(6) |
However we should take the other side of the plane possibility, thus we should simply multiply the result x2. Therefore the end potential of photons being emitted is 8,809 %.
The fraction of generated and emitted photons (escaping from the LED) will depend on the reflections inside the device, thus a very commonly used formula (not only for optics but for electronic transmission lines as well) for the reflection coefficient is defined as:
(7) |
which will be for our case:
(8) |
Now having the fraction of photons that have the potential of being emitted and the reflection coefficient, then the fraction of photons emitted will simply be:
(9) |
A short comment on the results, it seems that probably a proper geometry and configuration of the pn junction is crucial for the delivered efficiency from the device. Getting a reflection loss of roughly 3% while the photons with potential of being emitted is 8 % speaks by itself that due to the difference in refraction indexes of the materials used, the device loses a lot of its efficiency.